Showing posts with label court. Show all posts
Showing posts with label court. Show all posts

Thursday, September 26, 2013

Greenpeace team in Russian court

26 September 2013 Last updated at 09:33 GMT Greenpeace activist Richard Bruce is brought to court in Murmansk, 26 September The Greenpeace activists were brought to court in police vans A Russian court is meeting to rule on whether 30 Greenpeace activists should stay in custody pending an inquiry into their actions during an oil protest.

Activists were ferried to the courthouse in police vans in Murmansk, a port city north of the Arctic Circle.

Coastguards arrested the activists on suspicion of piracy after two scaled an offshore drilling platform.

Greenpeace says the campaigners, who are from 18 countries, were staging a legal, peaceful protest.

Russian President Vladimir Putin has said the activists are obviously "not pirates" but did not criticise their continued detention.

The charge of piracy carries a prison term of up to 15 years in Russia.

Thursday's proceedings in Murmansk's Lenin district court were broadcast live by TV teams which crowded into the small courtroom.

Greenpeace says that all of the activists have now been questioned in the presence of lawyers. Relatives of some of them told the BBC on Tuesday that they had spoken to them and they were all being well treated.

The BBC's Daniel Sandford: "This is the first time that Greenpeace have found themselves at the criminal end of the piracy law"

The drama began a week ago, when two activists successfully climbed on to the side of a platform operated by Gazprom, Russia's state gas monopoly.

They were detained after a short skirmish in inflatable dinghies in which armed Russian FSB officers in balaclavas fired warning shots into the water.

The ship, the Arctic Sunrise, with all its crew was then towed to Murmansk.

Russia views its huge fossil fuel deposits under the Arctic as vital to its economic future, which is why it takes any threat to their exploitation very seriously, the BBC's Daniel Sandford reports from Moscow.

The campaigners on the ship are from Australia, Brazil, Canada, Denmark, France, New Zealand, Russia, the UK and the US, Greenpeace said.

Map

View the original article here

Monday, September 16, 2013

U.S. appeals court revives lawsuit vs United Airlines over wheelchair

A United Airlines' Boeing Co's 787 Dreamliner plane approaches to land at New Tokyo international airport in Narita, east of Tokyo, on its flight from Los Angeles, January 17, 2013. REUTERS/Toru Hanai

A United Airlines' Boeing Co's 787 Dreamliner plane approaches to land at New Tokyo international airport in Narita, east of Tokyo, on its flight from Los Angeles, January 17, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Toru Hanai

By Dan Levine

SAN FRANCISCO | Wed Mar 13, 2013 6:39am EDT

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - A U.S. appeals court on Tuesday revived a lawsuit against United Continental Holdings Inc's United Airlines that was brought by a woman who claimed she was not promptly provided a wheelchair in an airport when she asked for one.

The opinion, from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco, said federal law did not pre-empt the woman's personal injury claims under state law.

A representative for United could not immediately be reached for comment.

Mark Meuser, an attorney for plaintiff Michelle Gilstrap, who has difficulty walking, said some lower court judges had disagreed about whether individuals should be able to bring claims for injuries in an airplane or terminal.

"This is a really big deal for disabled Americans across the country," Meuser said.

Gilstrap had difficulty walking due to a collapsed disc in her back and osteoarthritis, according to the court opinion. During two separate plane trips in 2008 and 2009, she alleged that United failed to supply a wheelchair on some occasions.

She also said United agents yelled at her, doubted whether she really needed a wheelchair and ordered her to stand in line, which she could not do because of her condition.

Gilstrap sued, and a Los Angeles federal judge dismissed her case. In Tuesday's three-judge ruling, the 9th Circuit said Gilstrap could not pursue her claims under the Americans for Disabilities Act.

However, the court ruled that Gilstrap's claims, including emotional distress and negligence, under state law were not pre-empted by the Air Carrier Access Act. The appeals court remanded the case for further proceedings.

The case in the 9th Circuit is Michelle Gilstrap vs. United Air Lines Inc., 11-55271.

(Reporting by Dan Levine; Editing by Lisa Von Ahn)


View the original article here